|
|
|
 |

seekfun
Apr 9, 2012, 8:16 AM
Post #1 of 131
(13986 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 2, 2004
Posts: 192
|
|
Here We Go: Wingsuit Landing Attempt Pending
|
Can't Post
|
|
Article
|
|
|
 |
 |

Couloirman
Apr 9, 2012, 9:17 AM
Post #2 of 131
(13938 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 21, 2006
Posts: 139
|
|
Re: [seekfun] Here We Go: Wingsuit Landing Attempt Pending
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
Hey I have an idea-- let's pretend like making a giant, elaborate landing pad in one fixed location is a huge step forward from being able to experience human flight with nothing but a 10lb piece of nylon on your back which allows you to fly and land anywhere you want. This is so futuristic man! I mean, we could have giant piles of cardboard over the entire earth so we can fly and land anywhere without the ridiculous inconvenience of a light weight, low profile backpack on our backs. Jesus, anyone else not even a little impressed by this? It honestly seems like a huge step backwards to me.
|
|
|
 |
 |

waltappel
Apr 9, 2012, 9:37 AM
Post #3 of 131
(13909 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 2, 2002
Posts: 398
|
|
Re: [Couloirman] Here We Go: Wingsuit Landing Attempt Pending
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
Couloirman wrote: Hey I have an idea-- let's pretend like making a giant, elaborate landing pad in one fixed location is a huge step forward from being able to experience human flight with nothing but a 10lb piece of nylon on your back which allows you to fly and land anywhere you want. This is so futuristic man! I mean, we could have giant piles of cardboard over the entire earth so we can fly and land anywhere without the ridiculous inconvenience of a light weight, low profile backpack on our backs. Jesus, anyone else not even a little impressed by this? It honestly seems like a huge step backwards to me. I am impressed. The guy is either retarded, delusional, and/or a liar, OR he ihas HUGE balls and is smart enough to do it in a way that is survivable. How he will be viewed kinda depends on whether he successfully pulls it off. I think low-tech can easily be as impressive as high-tech. The guys who started the ball rolling on modern BASE and developed many of the techniques and equipment concepts still in use today were archaic by today's standards. They were badasses, though. And a lot of the jumps they did are still badass. Rick and Randy's TUOP (2 under one parachute) jump comes to mind. Freefalling a building and deploying a skydiving round canopy was pretty badass. The Hobo jumps were badass. There are plenty of other examples. Maybe the land-a-wingsuit-on-cardboard guy is an innovator or maybe he's not but even if he pulls it off and makes it look easy, you will still have a hell of a time finding another jumper with the balls to do it and the skills to pull it off. "He will experience a 60 mph forward speed with a 22mph vertical descent rate – before he brings the speed down slowly." "Approximately 200ft away from his landing target - a 12ft deep, 350-ftx 45-ft cardboard runway - he must flare his wingsuit to bring his gliding speed down to 50mph and his vertical falling speed to 15mph." "The whole flight is due to last about 50 seconds." You will never see me even considering anything like that. Walt
(This post was edited by waltappel on Apr 9, 2012, 9:54 PM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

seekfun
Apr 9, 2012, 10:18 AM
Post #4 of 131
(13862 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 2, 2004
Posts: 192
|
|
Re: [Couloirman] Here We Go: Wingsuit Landing Attempt Pending
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
Couloirman wrote: Jesus, anyone else not even a little impressed by this? It honestly seems like a huge step backwards to me. To your point about having to land specifically where the recycled cardboard boxes are, I don't think the rewards of this experiment are all that valuable to the human flight community. I agree with you that the freedom afforded us by our canopies is a pretty wonderful thing, indeed. With that said, I see this as more of a stunt. And if it's viewed as nothing more than that, I can allow myself to be somewhat impressed, in that a human being is daring enough to dream, and daring enough to explore uncertain boundaries, which is a spirit largely lost from society today. But I'm inclined to believe this stunt will do little to advance our activity, because even if landing sans canopy becomes highly refined, it will require fixed locations and extraordinary flying skills. Big, big, big ball sack on this dude, though. No doubt.
|
|
|
 |
 |

long2jump
Apr 9, 2012, 10:56 AM
Post #6 of 131
(13805 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 29, 2009
Posts: 22
|
|
Re: [robinheid] Here We Go: Wingsuit Landing Attempt Pending
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
I am very curious to how this is going to play out! Curious as to what this will bring the sport, given it will take some time.
|
|
|
 |
 |

jtholmes
Apr 9, 2012, 11:12 AM
Post #7 of 131
(13787 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 23, 2003
Posts: 303
|
|
Re: [long2jump] Here We Go: Wingsuit Landing Attempt Pending
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
Me too. Very curious as to how this will go. One thing that will always inhibit us from truly landing our wingsuits wherever we want is the fact that our bones are not hollow like birds' bones. Even if we become highly skilled and anorexic skinny like the nordic ski jumpers who most impressively fly their bodies, our skeleton and the amount of water our bodies carry will always weigh too much for the surface area that we are able to fly in the form of a wingsuit. As wingsuits grow bigger and bigger and we use batons etc... to increase surface area, we evolve further and further toward an item that already exists that can be landed: the hang glider. I believe that for landings to occur without arduous and expensive catcher rigs, the line will be blurred as to whether what is being flown is a hang glider or a wing suit.
|
|
|
 |
 |

TomAiello
Apr 9, 2012, 11:30 AM
Post #8 of 131
(13763 views)
Shortcut
|
|
Re: [seekfun] Here We Go: Wingsuit Landing Attempt Pending
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
seekfun wrote: But I'm inclined to believe this stunt will do little to advance our activity... The point of a jump (any jump) isn't to advance "our activity." It's for an individual to do something that they want to do. That's the whole purpose of virtually all recreational activities that humans engage in. Deciding to do whatever it is you want to do--an aerial from 150', landing in a pile of boxes (or a giant waterside, or a stuntman's airbag), kicking a ball set on a ledge in free fall, or whatever else--is just a matter of wanting to do something. There is really no rational reason for any of it. People who are crazy enough to jump off stuff with a parachute on are probably crazy enough to do a lot of other pointless stuff, too. I once heard a wise man say "we jump to feel feelings--that's it." That's a pretty good summary of why we jump, and also why we choose to do any particular jump. In the final analysis though, there's no excuse for most our behavior.
(This post was edited by TomAiello on Apr 9, 2012, 11:31 AM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

dbagdrew
Apr 9, 2012, 2:02 PM
Post #9 of 131
(13636 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 5, 2003
Posts: 171
|
|
Re: [Couloirman] Here We Go: Wingsuit Landing Attempt Pending
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
Couloirman wrote: It honestly seems like a huge step backwards to me. Landing in these boxes reminds me (a little) of guys learning to land back-flips into a foam pit. Sure, landing in a foam pit looks a little lame, but you are still doing a back-flip, and you are working towards landing one on hard ground. If he is successful, however lame people here think he looks, he will still be the first to land a Wingsuit. You have to start somewhere, right?
|
|
|
 |
 |

seekfun
Apr 9, 2012, 4:23 PM
Post #10 of 131
(13539 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 2, 2004
Posts: 192
|
|
Re: [TomAiello] Here We Go: Wingsuit Landing Attempt Pending
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
I agree with you, Tom. Hence,
seekfun wrote: With that said, I see this as more of a stunt. And if it's viewed as nothing more than that, I can allow myself to be somewhat impressed, in that a human being is daring enough to dream, and daring enough to explore uncertain boundaries, which is a spirit largely lost from society today. I hope he enjoys the hell out of the jump. And it doesn't have to have any purpose higher than that. I was merely responding to the question of whether this was necessary. And no, it isn't necessary and doesn't need to be to legitimize the jump. ~ Chris
|
|
|
 |
 |

OuttaBounZ
Apr 9, 2012, 5:01 PM
Post #11 of 131
(13512 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 9, 2010
Posts: 882
|
|
Re: [seekfun] Here We Go: Wingsuit Landing Attempt Pending
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
article wrote: "Gary said he would wear a parachute under his suit as back-up - telling us that it was vital in case there was a freak gust of wind." I'm impressed! I just hope that with all of his experience he remembers to leave part of his rig outside his suit. I hope he lives and drinks tea and Champagne. Haters gonna hate.
|
|
|
 |
 |

RickHarrison
Apr 9, 2012, 7:27 PM
Post #12 of 131
(13441 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 27, 2003
Posts: 199
|
|
Re: [jtholmes] Here We Go: Wingsuit Landing Attempt Pending
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
Walt, JT and Tom, I think you're all right on. Walt, thanks for the kudos on the TUOP jump, actually, when Smitty got us to do it first in 82 at High Bridge, we called it TWOP, (two with one parachute). Same deal. Tom A helped us with one out in Twin a few years ago. Anyway, times change and so do skills and technology. I applaud anyone who even tries to land a wingsuit. It will happen and beyond. It's the nature of mankind especially in aviation. My only question is what is wrong with a long glacier, like Mt. Blanc in France or some other. Seems like a more forgiving landing area, but I'm not the person trying this one. Best of Luck to whoever makes it and WALKS Away. That is the goal isn't it?? Rick H cliffleaper 38
|
|
|
 |
 |

robinheid
Apr 10, 2012, 8:49 AM
Post #13 of 131
(13208 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 20, 2003
Posts: 251
|
|
Re: [RickHarrison] Here We Go: Wingsuit Landing Attempt Pending
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
RickHarrison wrote: My only question is what is wrong with a long glacier, like Mt. Blanc in France or some other. Seems like a more forgiving landing area... Well, for one thing, southern boy, glaciers are usually pretty effing rough and in most cases, not steep at all.
To me the primo landing zone at this stage of wingsuit landing development is on a speed skiing run: groomed to great smoothmess and extremely steep. People ski those slopes at 150 mph+, so landing a wingsuit on one at <100 mph should be pretty doable, especially with some sort of runners on the front of the suit. Simpler, safer and less expensive than Jeb's plan, more elegant than the box pile. JT, WTF, monn? Why haven't you already done this? 44
|
|
|
 |
 |

robinheid
Apr 10, 2012, 9:05 AM
Post #14 of 131
(13192 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 20, 2003
Posts: 251
|
|
Re: [jtholmes] Here We Go: Wingsuit Landing Attempt Pending
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
jtholmes wrote: Me too. Very curious as to how this will go. One thing that will always inhibit us from truly landing our wingsuits wherever we want is the fact that our bones are not hollow like birds' bones. Even if we become highly skilled and anorexic skinny like the nordic ski jumpers who most impressively fly their bodies, our skeleton and the amount of water our bodies carry will always weigh too much for the surface area that we are able to fly in the form of a wingsuit. As wingsuits grow bigger and bigger and we use batons etc... to increase surface area, we evolve further and further toward an item that already exists that can be landed: the hang glider. I believe that for landings to occur without arduous and expensive catcher rigs, the line will be blurred as to whether what is being flown is a hang glider or a wing suit. Concur generally with where you think wingsuit development will go, though it was in fact the removal of battens from the equation that reduced the fatality rate for wingsuit wearers (or batwing jumpers, as they were known) from 75 percent to, well, a lot less than that now. Reintroducing battens now, using semi-rigid materials, may overcome that particular obstacle, as will the addition of skids and/or wheels because, no matter how close we approach hang glider wing loadings, a better landing analogy will be rigid gliders, which also need wheels and/or skids because we can't slow them down enough to stick the landing like we do on a parachute or hang glider. Finally, the line of difference between wingsuits and hang gliders may be approached but but it will never blur because there will always be one cardinal distinction; you fly inside one and hang below the other. 44
P.S. The coolest thing about what Gary and Jeb are working towards is that here we are already discussing how landing wingsuits without parachutes is going to develop!
|
|
|
 |
 |

Couloirman
Apr 10, 2012, 9:12 AM
Post #15 of 131
(13174 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 21, 2006
Posts: 139
|
|
Re: [robinheid] Here We Go: Wingsuit Landing Attempt Pending
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
robinheid wrote: RickHarrison wrote: My only question is what is wrong with a long glacier, like Mt. Blanc in France or some other. Seems like a more forgiving landing area... Well, for one thing, southern boy, glaciers are usually pretty effing rough and in most cases, not steep at all. To me the primo landing zone at this stage of wingsuit landing development is on a speed skiing run: groomed to great smoothmess and extremely steep. People ski those slopes at 150 mph+, so landing a wingsuit on one at <100 mph should be pretty doable, especially with some sort of runners on the front of the suit. Simpler, safer and less expensive than Jeb's plan, more elegant than the box pile. JT, WTF, monn? Why haven't you already done this? 44  Along those same lines, maybe a long stretch of perfectly straight highway at a bit of an incline could be landed on with a street luge type setup on ones belly. Those things can even brake so wouldn't be too out of the realm of possibility to land and slow down as opposed to just sliding uncontrollably down a snow slope and probably tomahawking ones way towards serious injury/death.
|
|
|
 |
 |

lowcountryBase
Apr 10, 2012, 10:24 AM
Post #16 of 131
(13105 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 18, 2007
Posts: 195
|
|
Re: [Couloirman] Here We Go: Wingsuit Landing Attempt Pending
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
The ground rush must be insane!
|
|
|
 |
 |

-rm
Apr 10, 2012, 1:51 PM
Post #17 of 131
(12980 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 19, 2011
Posts: 90
|
|
Re: [lowcountryBase] Here We Go: Wingsuit Landing Attempt Pending
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
Since a wingsuit essentially is a 2 kg fighter-jet (with no motors, landing gears or weapons) I think the best way to land it in a short distance will be like landing on an aircraft carrier. Mount a hook to your leg and catch a brake-line, then quickly move your elbow and hands into the landing-gear position. Fit a large skid-pad on the forearms - these also act as a rigid leading edge in flight. What can possibly go wrong? Trust your rears, never give up the gate. Safety third.
|
|
|
 |
 |

jtholmes
Apr 11, 2012, 6:56 AM
Post #19 of 131
(12616 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 23, 2003
Posts: 303
|
|
Re: [robinheid] Here We Go: Wingsuit Landing Attempt Pending
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
robinheid wrote: RickHarrison wrote: My only question is what is wrong with a long glacier, like Mt. Blanc in France or some other. Seems like a more forgiving landing area... Well, for one thing, southern boy, glaciers are usually pretty effing rough and in most cases, not steep at all. To me the primo landing zone at this stage of wingsuit landing development is on a speed skiing run: groomed to great smoothmess and extremely steep. People ski those slopes at 150 mph+, so landing a wingsuit on one at <100 mph should be pretty doable, especially with some sort of runners on the front of the suit. Simpler, safer and less expensive than Jeb's plan, more elegant than the box pile. JT, WTF, monn? Why haven't you already done this? 44  The old land a wingsuit on a speed skiing slope idea... THere are many flaws to this totally survivable plan. 1) a wingsuit is the exact opposite article of clothing of a speed skier's suit. a WS creates too much drag for going fast down a speed ski slope. I have skied in a wingsuti and it gets squirrely at high speeds. any assymetry will spin or tumble the person going for it. 2) sliding on snow that fast burns skin 3) belly sliding gives zero suspension, could break spine. If you watch a bunch of speed ski videos, you will be amazed how much they use their knees. 4) flaring a wingsuit out to slow down changes angle of attack such that you are more head high than the hill, your body will scorpion on impact I would much rather biff into a bunch of powder snow, and that is totally doable, match the slopes when the snow is ultra deep and just go for it and tumble like hell. you could get away with that and somebody will someday, but as a skier who has tomahawked down 1700ft of swiss mountain in 2010... I avoid a repeat of that act.
|
|
|
 |
 |

robinheid
Apr 11, 2012, 10:07 AM
Post #20 of 131
(12512 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 20, 2003
Posts: 251
|
|
Re: [jtholmes] Here We Go: Wingsuit Landing Attempt Pending
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
jtholmes wrote: robinheid wrote: RickHarrison wrote: My only question is what is wrong with a long glacier, like Mt. Blanc in France or some other. Seems like a more forgiving landing area... Well, for one thing, southern boy, glaciers are usually pretty effing rough and in most cases, not steep at all. To me the primo landing zone at this stage of wingsuit landing development is on a speed skiing run: groomed to great smoothmess and extremely steep. People ski those slopes at 150 mph+, so landing a wingsuit on one at <100 mph should be pretty doable, especially with some sort of runners on the front of the suit. Simpler, safer and less expensive than Jeb's plan, more elegant than the box pile. JT, WTF, monn? Why haven't you already done this? 44  The old land a wingsuit on a speed skiing slope idea... THere are many flaws to this totally survivable plan. 1) a wingsuit is the exact opposite article of clothing of a speed skier's suit. a WS creates too much drag for going fast down a speed ski slope. I have skied in a wingsuti and it gets squirrely at high speeds. any assymetry will spin or tumble the person going for it. 2) sliding on snow that fast burns skin 3) belly sliding gives zero suspension, could break spine. If you watch a bunch of speed ski videos, you will be amazed how much they use their knees. 4) flaring a wingsuit out to slow down changes angle of attack such that you are more head high than the hill, your body will scorpion on impact I would much rather biff into a bunch of powder snow, and that is totally doable, match the slopes when the snow is ultra deep and just go for it and tumble like hell. you could get away with that and somebody will someday, but as a skier who has tomahawked down 1700ft of swiss mountain in 2010... I avoid a repeat of that act. Woohoo! Glad you survived your epic tomahawk with apparently no lasting damage. Thanks for the perspective on the speed ski run landing. Dumb idea, I guess. Never mind. 44
|
|
|
 |
 |

KidWicked
Apr 16, 2012, 8:48 AM
Post #21 of 131
(12184 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 9, 2004
Posts: 198
|
|
Re: [robinheid] Here We Go: Wingsuit Landing Attempt Pending
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
No update on this? The BBC web site said it would be "a couple of days", and that was a week ago...
|
|
|
 |
 |

dan_inagap
Apr 16, 2012, 9:02 AM
Post #22 of 131
(12166 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 17, 2009
Posts: 431
|
|
Re: [KidWicked] Here We Go: Wingsuit Landing Attempt Pending
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
Maybe he is sorting out his life insurance, I'm pretty sure his premiums went up after the press release
|
|
|
 |
 |

jools
Apr 16, 2012, 9:40 AM
Post #23 of 131
(12133 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 25, 2005
Posts: 183
|
|
Re: [dan_inagap] Here We Go: Wingsuit Landing Attempt Pending
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
http://xcweather.co.uk/forecast/oxford Been like this pretty much for the last 8-10 days. Laters Julian
(This post was edited by jools on Apr 16, 2012, 9:41 AM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

Hellis
Apr 16, 2012, 9:50 AM
Post #24 of 131
(12112 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 2, 2010
Posts: 172
|
|
Re: [jools] Here We Go: Wingsuit Landing Attempt Pending
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
Maybe that was his plan all along. Go to the press and say he will land his wingsuit on a good weather day in the UK. And we all fell for it.
|
|
|
 |
 |

wwarped
Moderator
Apr 16, 2012, 10:33 AM
Post #25 of 131
(12059 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 9, 2004
Posts: 3124
|
|
Re: [KidWicked] Here We Go: Wingsuit Landing Attempt Pending
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
in the US, USPA and the FAA would seriously frown upon jumping a single parachute system from an airplane. BUT that would most safely permit a low altitude abort. I wonder how he convinced the British organization(s) to allow this? (I hope his boxes don't get wet...)
|
|
|
 |
|